Review from New Scientist, 18 March 2013
Making plutonium for nuclear bombs takes balls, but not in
the way you might think. In 1965 scientists at the Hanford nuclear weapons complex
in Washington State wanted to investigate the impact of radiation on fertility
- and they weren’t hidebound by ethics.
In a specially fortified room in the basement of Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla, volunteer prisoners were asked to lie face down on a trapezoid-shaped bed. They put their legs into stirrups, and let their testicles drop into a plastic box of water where they were zapped by x-rays.
The experiments, which lasted for a decade and involved 131 prisoners, came up with some unsurprising results. Even at the lowest dose – 0.1 gray – sperm was damaged, and at twice that the prisoners became sterile. They were paid five dollars a month for their trouble, plus $25 per biopsy and $100 for a compulsory vasectomy at the end so they didn’t father children with mutations.
The testicle tests are just one of many disturbing details Kate Brown has unearthed from the official archives in her fascinating nuclear history. She also tells how tunnelling muskrats undermined one of Hanford’s storage ponds, causing 16 million gallons of radioactive effluent to pour into the Columbia river.
And there is the scary tale of how Hanford scientists in 1949 conducted one of their most risky experiments, later dubbed the “green run”. For seven hours they processed highly radioactive ‘green’ fuel that hadn’t been allowed to decay for as long as usual - and showered 407,000 gigabecquerels of radioactive iodine over nearby cities.
The green run is said to have been an attempt to mimic what the US thought the then Soviet Union was doing to boost plutonium production at its Mayak nuclear weapons plant at Ozersk in the Urals. It is the looking-glass links between Hanford and Mayak, and the communities that host them, that form the central theme of Brown’s book.
They were two secretive citadels, dedicated to producing as much plutonium as possible to fuel the Cold War arsenals of the world’s two opposing superpowers. They both conferred wealth and privilege on their elite staff, copying each other to create what Brown styles as a ‘plutopia’.
But the two vast creaking nuclear complexes also deliberately discharged huge amounts of radioactivity into the environment, cut corners and caused countless accidents and leaks. Brown estimates that during their existence they each released at least 7.4 billion gigabecquerels, four times the amount released by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine in 1986.
The rivers that drain the two sites, the Columbia and the Techa, have both been called the most radioactive in the world, and many thousands of people who live downstream and downwind say the contamination has made them sick. They are, says Brown, “slow motion disasters” created and covered up by state machines.
Brown argues that the US and the Soviet Union both subverted science to maintain the plutopia. The most shocking example was the US Atomic Energy Commission’s takeover of seminal Japanese research into the health impacts of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This was necessary, according to a senior AEC official in 1955, to ensure that “misleading and unsound reports” were “kept to a minimum”.
Brown’s account is unique, partisan and occasionally personal in that she includes some of her thoughts about interviews she conducted: for example, she recounts how she ended up becoming friends with one interviewee. But because she is open and thorough about her sources, those are strengths to be celebrated, not weaknesses to be deplored. It also means her book is engaging, honest and, in the end, entirely credible.
Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters by Kate Brown, $27.95.
Hanford Mayak...Chernovyl Fukushima...USA China Dolar&Yuan...
Posted by: hermes | 24 March 2013 at 02:35 AM